Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Magnus Hagander
Тема Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance
Дата
Msg-id 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE92E7A9@algol.sollentuna.se
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> > > OK, running the latest patch.  Observations:
> > > ...
> > > I ran tests for about an hour, randomly killing/canceling
> backends
> > > without any problems.
> >
> > Are we all comfortable that
> > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-10/msg01009.php
> > is OK to apply?
>
> Yea. I can vouch for Magnus as well (he said so off list).
> I'd vote with my own servers anyways.

Yup, and I can also vouch fo rmyself ;-) Just didn't get around to it
until now.

Yes, I believe we should be fine with that patch, even though we're late
in beta. It's a huge win, so I htink it's worth the small extra risk it
is.

//Magnus


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Merlin Moncure"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PG Killed by OOM Condition