Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance
Дата
Msg-id 14410.1130253389@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance  ("Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
"Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net> writes:
>>> Are we all comfortable that
>>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-10/msg01009.php
>>> is OK to apply?
>> 
>> Yea. I can vouch for Magnus as well (he said so off list).  
>> I'd vote with my own servers anyways.

> Yup, and I can also vouch fo rmyself ;-) Just didn't get around to it
> until now.

> Yes, I believe we should be fine with that patch, even though we're late
> in beta. It's a huge win, so I htink it's worth the small extra risk it
> is.

OK, patch committed.  Please recheck that CVS tip is OK.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: sort_mem statistics ...
Следующее
От: Yohanes Santoso
Дата:
Сообщение: determining random_page_cost value