pg_* Tables

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Samuel Stearns
Тема pg_* Tables
Дата
Msg-id 68B59BEDCD36854AADBDF17E91B2937A07844CCA60@EXCHMAIL.staff.internode.com.au
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: pg_* Tables  (Greg Williamson <gwilliamson39@yahoo.com>)
Список pgsql-admin

Howdy,

 

Environment:

 

Solaris 10

Postgres 8.3.3

 

I’m getting high sequential scans for some pg_* tables:

 

<database>=# select relname, sum(seq_scan) as seq_scan,sum(seq_tup_read) as seq_tup_read,sum(idx_scan) as idx_scan, sum(idx_tup_fetch) as idx_tup_fetch, sum(n_tup_ins) as n_tup_ins, sum(n_tup_upd) as n_tup_upd, sum(n_tup_del) as n_tup_del from  pg_stat_all_tables group by 1 order by 2 desc limit 4;

             relname             | seq_scan | seq_tup_read | idx_scan | idx_tup_fetch | n_tup_ins | n_tup_upd | n_tup_del

---------------------------------+----------+--------------+----------+---------------+-----------+-----------+-----------

<table> |  6896498 |     91295702 |   107663 |        469057 |    103966 |    103966 |    103966

pg_authid                       |  3119053 |    125950392 | 12000732 |      12000718 |         1 |         1 |         0

pg_am                           |  2642438 |      2642440 |        5 |             5 |         0 |         0 |         0

pg_database                     |  1349020 |     14771768 |  6953392 |       6953392 |         0 |         0 |         0

(4 rows)

 

<database>=#

 

Is this normal?  Is it advisable to index pg_* tables?

 

Thank you,

 

Sam

В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: failing to compile v. 9.0.1 on debian squeeze with readline
Следующее
От: Greg Williamson
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_* Tables