Re: DELETE performance problem

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Luca Tettamanti
Тема Re: DELETE performance problem
Дата
Msg-id 68676e00911240714n5dd717fbxb2b0e3b8827cf539@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на DELETE performance problem  (Luca Tettamanti <kronos.it@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: DELETE performance problem  (Thom Brown <thombrown@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-performance
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Jerry Champlin
<jchamplin@absolute-performance.com> wrote:
> You may want to consider using partitioning.  That way you can drop the
> appropriate partition and never have the overhead of a delete.

Hum, I don't think it's doable in my case; the partitioning is not
know a priori. First t1 is fully populated, then the data is loaded
and manipulated by my application, the result is stored in t2; only
then I want to remove (part of) the data from t1.

thanks,
Luca

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Luca Tettamanti
Дата:
Сообщение: DELETE performance problem
Следующее
От: Thom Brown
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: DELETE performance problem