> On 06 Sep 2017, at 14:25, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> writes:
>> Fine for 0002. This reminds me of LockGXact and RemoveGXact in
>> twophase.c, as well as _hash_squeezebucket that have some code paths
>> that cannot return... Any thoughts about having some kind of
>> PG_NOTREACHED defined to 0 which could be put in an assertion?
>
> Generally we just do "Assert(false)", maybe with "not reached" in a
> comment. I don't feel a strong need to invent a new way to do that.
Moving this to the next commitfest and bumping status to Ready for committer
based on the discussion in this thread.
cheers ./daniel
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers