Re: [GENERAL] pg_last_xact_replay_timestamp() sometimes reportsunlikely, very large delays
| От | Toby Corkindale |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [GENERAL] pg_last_xact_replay_timestamp() sometimes reportsunlikely, very large delays |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 679631248.285932.1490324595264.JavaMail.zimbra@strategicdata.com.au обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] pg_last_xact_replay_timestamp() sometimes reports unlikely, very large delays (John DeSoi <desoi@pgedit.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
----- Original Message ----- > > On Mar 22, 2017, at 8:06 PM, Toby Corkindale > > <toby.corkindale@strategicdata.com.au> wrote: > > > > My best guess for what is going on is: > > - There has been no activity for hours or days, and so the oldest replayed > > transaction on the slave is genuinely quite old. > > - Something has happened on the master that causes its > > pg_current_xlog_location() to be updated, but not in a way that is sent to > > the > > slave until the end of a long-running transaction. > > > > > > Could anyone suggest how to do this in a manner that avoids the problem? > > Are you using streaming replication or only WAL archiving? If you are not > streaming the archive command does not send the file until it is full (16MB, > if I recall correctly). To address this, you can change the archive_timeout > setting to ensure the WAL file is sent at some interval even if it is not > full. Apologies, I should have mentioned. We're using streaming replication.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: