Re: [HACKERS] Re: AWL: PostgreSQL ODBC.
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Re: AWL: PostgreSQL ODBC. |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 6615.909514136@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Re: AWL: PostgreSQL ODBC. ("Thomas G. Lockhart" <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Thomas G. Lockhart" <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu> writes:
> Actually, I don't know why the Makefile.shlib needs anything
> platform-specific other than perhaps helping with the naming conventions
> for libraries. If the LDFLAGS_SL was in the platform template then
> Makefile.shlib wouldn't need anything in that regard, right?
You're right, much of that stuff could be shoved out into the
Makefile.port files. Maybe all of it --- does anyone know GNU Make's
substitution rules well enough to know whether
shlib := lib$(NAME)$(DLSUFFIX).$(SO_MAJOR_VERSION).$(SO_MINOR_VERSION)
can appear *before* NAME and so forth get defined? If so, the
library naming rule could be defined by Makefile.port too. I was
being conservative when I wrote Makefile.shlib, but I'm not sure
that the order of declarations it recommends is really essential.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: