Re: [HACKERS] Reorganization of spinlock defines

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Reorganization of spinlock defines
Дата
Msg-id 6487.1063339609@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Reorganization of spinlock defines  (Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Reorganization of spinlock defines  (Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org>)
Список pgsql-patches
Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org> writes:
> I've already sent a whine-a-gram to the compiler guys at SCO.

Prolly you thought of this already, but: getting them to *add*
an implicit #define of __i386__ should be plenty easy compared
to getting them to *remove* the one for i386.  And while I think
they should remove the latter, the immediate problem would be
solved as soon as they add the former.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Larry Rosenman
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Reorganization of spinlock defines
Следующее
От: "Marc G. Fournier"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Reorganization of spinlock defines