Re: [PATCHES] Reorganization of spinlock defines

--On Friday, September 12, 2003 00:06:49 -0400 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
wrote:

> Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org> writes:
>> I've already sent a whine-a-gram to the compiler guys at SCO.
>
> Prolly you thought of this already, but: getting them to *add*
> an implicit #define of __i386__ should be plenty easy compared
> to getting them to *remove* the one for i386.  And while I think
> they should remove the latter, the immediate problem would be
> solved as soon as they add the former.
sure, and I expect that's what they may do.  We'll see what they say.

LER

>
>             regards, tom lane



--
Larry Rosenman                     http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812                 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749