Re: Conservation of OIDs
От | |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Conservation of OIDs |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 64784.216.238.112.88.1068835070.squirrel@$HOSTNAME обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Conservation of OIDs (Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg@aon.at>) |
Ответы |
Re: Conservation of OIDs
Re: Conservation of OIDs |
Список | pgsql-general |
> > If you're really concerned, you can initdb separate clusters for QAT > and DEV and run three postmasters using three different ports. > Follow-up question: Are different ports really necessary? I currently have the three different databases defined all in the same cluster, and differentiated by name, e.g., mydb, mydbqat, and mydbdev. If I have the postmaster start these three instances in separate clusters, respectively, using three different directories, such as $ postmaster -D /usr/local/pgsql/data $ postmaster -D /usr/local/pgsql/qat $ postmaster -D /usr/local/pgsql/dev and make no change regarding which port the daemon listens on, but DO have a single, unique database name, one per cluster (mydb, mydbqat, mydbdev) in the respective clusters, will connections requests to any one of these databases on that same port find their way to the right place (and back)? Or maybe would be better to not used different database names at all to differential PROD, QAT, and DEV, and instead differentiate solely which cluster is to be used by means of your suggestion of using different ports? I dunno. What do you think? ~Berend Tober
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: