Re: Is there an equivalent for Oracle's user_tables.num_rows

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Is there an equivalent for Oracle's user_tables.num_rows
Дата
Msg-id 6478.1171068303@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Is there an equivalent for Oracle's user_tables.num_rows  ("Virag Saksena" <virag@auptyma.com>)
Ответы Re: Is there an equivalent for Oracle'suser_tables.num_rows
Список pgsql-performance
"Virag Saksena" <virag@auptyma.com> writes:
> Does someone know of a way of telling what the optimizer believes the =
> number of rows are ?

You're looking in the wrong place; see pg_class.relpages and reltuples.

But note that in recent releases neither one is taken as gospel.
Instead the planner uses the current physical table size in place of
relpages, and scales reltuples correspondingly.  So neither steady
growth nor truncation create a need for re-ANALYZE; at least not as long
as the other statistics don't change too much.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Virag Saksena"
Дата:
Сообщение: Is there an equivalent for Oracle's user_tables.num_rows
Следующее
От: "Virag Saksena"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Is there an equivalent for Oracle's user_tables.num_rows