Re: [GENERAL] Postgres 10.1 fails to start: server did not start in time

Andres Freund  writes:
> we could really do better than just wonder whether our signal to
> shutdown was received or not.  There probably should be a quite short
> timeout for the server to change status, and then a much longer one for
> that shutdown to finish.

While I don't want to just raise the timeout, I could get behind a more
thorough rethinking of the behavior there.
		regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general