On 10/20/22 10:02, Adrian Klaver wrote:
> On 10/20/22 06:20, Ron wrote:
>> On 10/20/22 00:12, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Frank Gard <frank.von.postgresql.org@familie-gard.de> writes:
>>>> Am 20.10.22 um 02:58 schrieb Ron:
>>>>> pg_restore -v --create --clean --jobs=`nproc` -Fd --dbname=template1 $DB
>>>> What database do you want to restore your data into? As far as I know
>>>> your pg_restore command would import the data into template1, right?
>>> No --- my ears went up about that too, but he's using --create.
>>> So template1 is just the springboard for the initial connection
>>> in which CREATE DATABASE will be issued.
>>>
>>> My guess is that there's something inconsistent between source
>>> and target installations about roles and role-privilege grants.
>>> We don't have enough details to do more than guess, though.
>>
>> I ran "pg_dumpall --globals-only --no-role-passwords" on the source
>> instance, and applied it to the new instance before doing the pg_restore.
>> If I hadn't done that, pg_restore would have thrown errors on all the
>> GRANT and ALTER TABLE ... OWNER TO statements embedded in the backup.
>>
>
> Some questions:
>
> 1) The backup was from a Postgres 12.x database using a version 12 or
> higher instance of pg_backup?
pg_dump and pg_restore are 12.11 from RHEL8.
> 3) What if you run without --jobs?
It runs without error. Add "--jobs=2" and the errors appear.
--
Angular momentum makes the world go 'round.