On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Matthew Wakeling <matthew@flymine.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Feb 2010, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>
>> Was there every any conclusion on this issue?
>
> Not really. Comments inline:
>
>> Matthew Wakeling wrote:
>>>
>>> Revisiting the thread a month back or so, I'm still investigating
>>> performance problems with GiST indexes in Postgres.
>>>
>>> Looking at http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_8.4_Open_Items I'd
>>> like to clarify the contrib/seg issue. Contrib/seg is vulnerable to
>>> pathological behaviour which is fixed by my second patch, which can be
>>> viewed as complete. Contrib/cube, being multi-dimensional, is not
>>> affected
>>> to any significant degree, so should not need alteration.
>
> This issue is addressed by my patch, which AFAIK noone has reviewed.
> However, that patch was derived from a patch that I applied to bioseg, which
> is itself a derivative of seg. This patch works very well indeed, and gave
> an approximate 100 times speed improvement in the one test I ran.
>
> So you could say that the sister patch of the one I submitted is tried and
> tested in production.
We rely fairly heavily on the commitfest app to track which patches
need review; perhaps it would be good to add it here.
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/commitfest_view/open
I seem to recall thinking that this patch wasn't ready to apply for
some reason, but I'm not sure why I thought that.
...Robert