Re: operator exclusion constraints

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: operator exclusion constraints
Дата
Msg-id 603c8f070911172013m6e930f7bnd7dba5764d60b31d@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: operator exclusion constraints  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
Ответы Re: operator exclusion constraints
Re: operator exclusion constraints
Re: operator exclusion constraints
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> wrote:
> New patches attached.

Forgive me if this is discussed before, but why does this store the
strategy numbers of the relevant operators instead of the operators
themselves?  It seems like this could lead to surprising behavior if
the user modifies the definition of the operator class.

I'm wondering if we can't use the existing
BuildIndexValueDescription() rather than the new function
tuple_as_string().  I realize there are two tuples, but maybe it makes
sense to just call it twice?

I'm attaching a revised doc patch for your consideration.

...Robert

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Itagaki Takahiro
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: UTF8 with BOM support in psql
Следующее
От: Itagaki Takahiro
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Syntax for partitioning