Re: ICU integration

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: ICU integration
Дата
Msg-id 6008673a-e371-8437-adc0-96fba4a74028@2ndquadrant.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: ICU integration  (Doug Doole <ddoole@salesforce.com>)
Ответы Re: ICU integration  (Doug Doole <ddoole@salesforce.com>)
Re: ICU integration  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 9/6/16 1:40 PM, Doug Doole wrote:
> We carried the ICU version numbers around on our collation and locale
> IDs (such as fr_FR%icu36) . The database would load multiple versions of
> the ICU library so that something created with ICU 3.6 would always be
> processed with ICU 3.6. This avoided the problems of trying to change
> the rules on the user. (We'd always intended to provide tooling to allow
> the user to move an existing object up to a newer version of ICU, but we
> never got around to doing it.) In the code, this meant we were
> explicitly calling the versioned API so that we could keep the calls
> straight.

I understand that in principle, but I don't see operating system
providers shipping a bunch of ICU versions to facilitate that.  They
will usually ship one.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Amit Kapila
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: WAL consistency check facility
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Install extensions using update scripts (was Re: Remove superuser() checks from pgstattuple)