Re: Should we document IS [NOT] OF?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Joe Conway
Тема Re: Should we document IS [NOT] OF?
Дата
Msg-id 5cc61826-13e4-9976-0d6d-fb37b01d93ac@joeconway.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Should we document IS [NOT] OF?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Should we document IS [NOT] OF?
Список pgsql-hackers
On 11/19/20 2:03 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> writes:
>> Is there a feature code? I skimmed the standard and non-standard tables in
>> our appendix and couldn’t find this in either.
>
> a19d9d3c4 seems to have thought it was S151.

Here is a link to previous list discussions:

https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/45DA44F3.3010401%40joeconway.com

HTH,

Joe

--
Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com
PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises
Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development


Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Amit Kapila
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions
Следующее
От: Tomas Vondra
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: POC: postgres_fdw insert batching