Re: should we enable log_checkpoints out of the box?

On 10/31/21 10:24 PM, Michael Banck wrote:
> To put another option on the table: maybe a compromise could be to log
> xlog checkpoints unconditionally, and the (checkpoint_timeout) time ones
> only if log_checkpoints are set (maybe with some exponential backoff to
> avoid log spam)?

If we're going to do something like that, we should convert it from a
boolean to an enum.

    log_checkpoints = wal

(I'm being very careful not to slip on that slope.)
-- 
Vik Fearing