On May 9, 2006, at 11:51 AM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Sorry that is an extremely misleading statement. SATA RAID is
> perfectly acceptable if you have a hardware raid controller with a
> battery backup controller.
>
> And dollar for dollar, SCSI will NOT be faster nor have the hard
> drive capacity that you will get with SATA.
Does this hold true still under heavy concurrent-write loads? I'm
preparing yet another big DB server and if SATA is a better option,
I'm all (elephant) ears.