(2018/01/29 9:50), Amit Langote wrote:
> On 2018/01/26 21:31, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
>> Attached is a modified
>> version of the patch. What do you think about that? Please let me know.
>> If that is okay, I'll mark this as Ready for Committer.
>
> That looks good, thanks.
Cool! One thing I noticed to revise the patch a bit further is to add
an assertion to make_partition_op_expr that the number of the right-hand
inputs to generate an operator expression from for list-partitioning
should be >=1; in that case we call that function if there is at least
one non-null partition value as the right-hand input, so that should be
asserted successfully there. I think the assertion is a good thing, so
I modified the patch. Updated patch attached. Because I made no
changes other than that, I'll make this as Ready for Committer.
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita