Re: [HACKERS] Cache query (PREPARE/EXECUTE)
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Cache query (PREPARE/EXECUTE) |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 5981.951349109@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Cache query (PREPARE/EXECUTE) (wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Cache query (PREPARE/EXECUTE)
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck) writes:
> OTOH, this new per-object-context stuff could hand down some
> lifetime flag, let's say MCXT_UNTIL_STATEMENT, MCXT_UTIL_XEND
> and MCXT_UNTIL_INFINITY to start from.
A good thing to keep in mind, but for the short term I'm not sure
we need it; the proposed new contexts are all for indefinite-lifetime
caches, so there's no chance to make them go away automatically.
Eventually we might have more uses for limited-lifetime contexts,
though.
Something else that needs to be looked at is how memory contexts
are tied to "portals" presently. That mechanism probably needs
to be redesigned. I have to admit I don't understand what it's
for...
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: