Re: Remove non-fast promotion Re: Should we remove a fallbackpromotion? take 2

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Fujii Masao
Тема Re: Remove non-fast promotion Re: Should we remove a fallbackpromotion? take 2
Дата
Msg-id 5936bac5-3dea-f9f9-7cd6-67c40ed22c3d@oss.nttdata.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Remove non-fast promotion Re: Should we remove a fallbackpromotion? take 2  (Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com>)
Ответы Re: Should we remove a fallback promotion? take 2
Список pgsql-hackers

On 2020/04/23 3:56, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Apr 2020 11:51:15 +0900
> Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 2020/04/22 10:53, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
>>   [...]
>>   [...]
>>   [...]
>>   [...]
>>   [...]
>>   [...]
>>   [...]
>>   [...]
>>   [...]
>>   [...]
>>   [...]
>>
>> Thanks all for checking whether the change affects each HA solution!
> 
> Unless I'm wrong, we don't have feedback from Patroni team.
> 
> I did some quick grep and it seems to rely on "pg_ctl promote" as well.
> Moreover, the latest commit 80fbe9005 force a checkpoint right after the
> promote. So I suppose they don't use non-fast promote.

Thanks for checking that!

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Fujii Masao
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: backup manifests
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Parallel Append can break run-time partition pruning