Re: ssl file permission

Rob Sargent <robjsargent@gmail.com> writes:
> Sorry. Execute permission for owner may have been on prior to chmod og-rwx .  I thought that might be a problem and
600eliminates that 

It seems highly unlikely that openssl would write the file with x
permission turned on.  Even if it did, there's no particular
reason for us to insist on changing it.

>> That said, it might be a good idea to be consistent since we seem to use a mix of different styles of chmod.

There is that.  But I think the "og-rwx" style is more recommendable,
if we're going to try to standardize.

            regards, tom lane