Re: Machine available for community use

Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim@CommandPrompt.com> writes:
> On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 19:14 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>> and RHEL performed much better than CentOS.

>> Not to be unkind, but I doubt that on an identical configuration.

> Each test took 1-2 days -- I will insist that CentOS performs poorer
> than RHEL.

I'm finding that hard to believe too.  There isn't any "secret sauce"
in the RHEL build process --- the CentOS guys should have been able to
duplicate the RHEL RPMs exactly.  Now it's possible that CentOS had
lagged in updating some performance-relevant package; did you compare
package versions across both OSes?
        regards, tom lane