Hi,
> In any case, the proposed patch almost certainly introduces new
> problems, in that you dropped the fcloses's into code that
> executes repeatedly.
I guess it's better to place fclose() right after successful syslogger start.
In that case we close descriptors just one time. But it's enough to solve the problem.
Developers who debug syslogger generally should see problems before we close descriptors.
In other case they can edit code of syslogger.
There is another way to solve this problem:
We can give users the opportunity to leave or close descriptors.
I.e. config switch for this. But I think that it's too complicated.
One can reproduce the problem by following steps in previous messages.
_________
Regards, Sviatoslav Ermilin