Re: A Modest Upgrade Proposal
| От | Joshua D. Drake |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: A Modest Upgrade Proposal |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 578D593A.3000002@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: A Modest Upgrade Proposal (Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 07/18/2016 03:17 PM, Jim Nasby wrote:
> On 7/17/16 2:22 PM, Petr Jelinek wrote:
> I do agree that DDL "feels better" (which I think is what JD was
> alluding too).
Yes and no. It reads better and is more clear to those who are not
developers or have a developer background which is, many in the database
field. It is also easier to type. I type 120 a minute on a roll, that is
until I have to do this ('[ ..... Simple wording base command structure
is much more efficient.
ALTER TABLE FOO ENABLE REPLICATION ON SLAVE 0;
vs
select enable_replication_for_table('['foo']',0);
Guess which one was typed without a single error and more quickly.
Sincerely,
JD
--
Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/ +1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: