Re: A Modest Upgrade Proposal

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Joshua D. Drake
Тема Re: A Modest Upgrade Proposal
Дата
Msg-id 578D593A.3000002@commandprompt.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: A Modest Upgrade Proposal  (Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 07/18/2016 03:17 PM, Jim Nasby wrote:
> On 7/17/16 2:22 PM, Petr Jelinek wrote:

> I do agree that DDL "feels better" (which I think is what JD was
> alluding too).

Yes and no. It reads better and is more clear to those who are not 
developers or have a developer background which is, many in the database 
field. It is also easier to type. I type 120 a minute on a roll, that is 
until I have to do this ('[ ..... Simple wording base command structure 
is much more efficient.

ALTER TABLE FOO ENABLE REPLICATION ON SLAVE 0;

vs

select enable_replication_for_table('['foo']',0);

Guess which one was typed without a single error and more quickly.

Sincerely,

JD




-- 
Command Prompt, Inc.                  http://the.postgres.company/                        +1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: application_name in process name?
Следующее
От: Craig Ringer
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: One process per session lack of sharing