Re: pg_dump - txt sql vs binary

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: pg_dump - txt sql vs binary
Дата
Msg-id 5773.1138031800@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pg_dump - txt sql vs binary  (Ciprian Hodorogea <ciprian.hodorogea@bitsp.com>)
Список pgsql-admin
Ciprian Hodorogea <ciprian.hodorogea@bitsp.com> writes:
> 2. All dumps generated with pg_dump seem to contain internal functions
> also, which then raise problems when trying to import. Can these be somehow
> excluded from the generated SQL backup?

> Is there a way to differentiate postgres internal functions from
> user-defined functions? (other but making up a list of those functions
> names)

I can think of several possibilities, but it's not clear what you need
to accomplish.  Would you show us details of the problem you're having,
rather than jumping to conclusions about how to fix it?  Bear in mind
that the rest of the world has found no need to do any such thing while
using pg_dump.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Ciprian Hodorogea
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_dump - txt sql vs binary
Следующее
От: Michael Fuhr
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_dump - txt sql vs binary