On 04/26/2016 08:46 PM, Josh berkus wrote:
> On 04/26/2016 06:49 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> I think the last version JD posted was much better.
>
> It was a much better description with *you* as the target audience, yes.
> However, you are not very representative of the majority of our users.
> My goal is to provide text which will make some sense to people who
> haven't paid any attention to PostgreSQL development since 9.5 was released.
>
I have been thinking about this more and I think I have a middle ground.
We should include my wording or wording that is similar to mine but we
should also include a link to a single page that discusses the
"practitioner" version of those features. The page should be simple:
Feature:
* Why it is good
* How to test it (if we can)
Sincerely,
JD
--
Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/
+1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.