Re: Partitioning and ORM tools

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Rob Sargent
Тема Re: Partitioning and ORM tools
Дата
Msg-id 56F19891.6060009@gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Partitioning and ORM tools  (Melvin Davidson <melvin6925@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Partitioning and ORM tools  (CS DBA <cs_dba@consistentstate.com>)
Список pgsql-general


On 03/22/2016 12:55 PM, Melvin Davidson wrote:
Your problem seems strange as it has never been previously reported for anyone else that has _successfully_ set up partioning.
Perhaps is you provide just a little bit more detail we might be able to help you.
Useful and needed information would be:
1. Version of PostgreSQL
2. Operating System
3. Table structure for partitioned table
4. Trigger function and trigger used for insert
5. The actual insert statement.

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 2:40 PM, CS DBA <cs_dba@consistentstate.com> wrote:
Hi All;

we setup partitioning for a large table but had to back off because the return status (i.e: "INSERT 0 1") returns "INSERT 0 0" when inserting into the partitioned table which causes the ORM tool to assume the insert inserted 0 rows.  Is there a standard / best practices work around for this?

Thanks in advance




--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general


And which ORM are you using.

I take it the problem is that the ORM is saying "zero rows inserted" and that's um, er, upsetting the client ( which might decide to retry and then generates an error for non-unique key or some such noise)

rjs


--
Melvin Davidson
I reserve the right to fantasize.  Whether or not you
wish to share my fantasy is entirely up to you.


В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Melvin Davidson
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Partitioning and ORM tools
Следующее
От: Kris Deugau
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Partitioning and ORM tools