Re: 9.6 -> 10.0

On 03/22/2016 10:11 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:

>
> I think there was talk of breaking pg_upgrade duringr an increase in the
> first digit, but as you stated, there isn't any technical demand for
> that.
>

I don't see a reason for the 10.x jump. If PgLogical and/or BDR had been
ready, then absolutely. Although the parallel query is certainly of
importance, I don't know if it is any more important than the
scalability fixes we got in 9.5.x.

Sincerely,

JD


--
Command Prompt, Inc.                  http://the.postgres.company/
                         +1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.