On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 08:54:55AM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> >> A counter argument might be waiting for pglogical for inclusion, but I think
> >> the current changes are enough to warrant a .0 release.
> >>
> >> What do you think?
> >
> > I think a big question is whether we want to save 10.0 for some
> > incompatibility changes, though we didn't do that for 8.0 or 9.0.
>
> AFAIK, there are no such incompatibilities proposed for any major
> features. So it might be time to stop holding out for those.
I think there was talk of breaking pg_upgrade duringr an increase in the
first digit, but as you stated, there isn't any technical demand for
that.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Roman grave inscription +