Re: Idle In Transaction Session Timeout, revived
| От | David Steele |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Idle In Transaction Session Timeout, revived |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 56B279B8.3010601@pgmasters.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Idle In Transaction Session Timeout, revived (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Idle In Transaction Session Timeout, revived
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2/3/16 4:25 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: >> On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 3:41 PM, Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@bluetreble.com> wrote: >>> Wouldn't it be more sensible to just roll the transaction back and not >>> disconnect? > > I'm not sure how messy this would be in practice. But if we think that > killing the whole session is not desirable but something we're doing for > expediency, then it would be worth looking into that approach. I think killing the session is a perfectly sensible thing to do in this case. Everything meaningful that was done in the session will be rolled back - no need to waste resources keeping the connection open. -- -David david@pgmasters.net
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: