Re: Re: Add generate_series(date, date) and generate_series(date, date, integer)
| От | David Steele |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Re: Add generate_series(date, date) and generate_series(date, date, integer) |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 56B0F090.1020705@pgmasters.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Re: Add generate_series(date, date) and generate_series(date, date, integer) (Corey Huinker <corey.huinker@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Re: Add generate_series(date, date) and
generate_series(date, date, integer)
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2/2/16 1:01 PM, Corey Huinker wrote: > Doh, I left that comment to myself in there. :) If I had a dime for every time I've done that... > The corresponding structs in timestamp.c and int.c have no comment, so > suggestions of what should be there are welcome. In the interim I put in > this: > > /* state for generate_series_date(date,date,[step]) */ I think that's fine -- whoever commits it may feel otherwise. > Do you have any insight as to why the documentation test failed? > > In the mean time, here's the updated patch. I didn't pass the docs on account of the wonky comment since I consider code comments to be part of the docs. The sgml docs build fine and look good to me. I'll retest and update the review accordingly. -- -David david@pgmasters.net
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: