On 10/21/2015 06:45 PM, Amir Rohan wrote:
> On 10/21/2015 05:04 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> Amir Rohan wrote:
>>> On 10/05/2015 01:57 PM, Amir Rohan wrote:
>>>> I previously suggested this could help SEO:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/560614CA.1080304@mail.com
>>>>
>>>> There wasn't much of a reaction but hopefully actually providing
>>>> the patch might make the difference.
>>>>
>>>> You'll now see something like:
>>>>
>>>> 9.2 / 9.3 / current (9.4)
>>>>
>>>> at the top of the page, with "current" linking /docs/current
>>>> and "9.4" linking /docs/9.4.
>>>>
>>>> For SEO purposes I think it would actually be better to elide
>>>> the numbered-version altogether, so people will have to do extra work
>>>> *not* to link to /docs/current/, but I figured that would turn into
>>>> a bikeshed, so this less intrusive version is what I'm sending.
>>>
>>> Bump. There's been no response to this, does the silence imply rejection
>>> or just very low priority?
>>
>> I think this is a good idea, and obviously so does Dave.
>>
>
> I'll bump periodically until it goes live or someone tells me to stop...
Sorry for this taking so long - but I now have applied PATCH 2/2, I
didnt bother applying the fixtures one due to multiple issues (some
preexisting):
* added hunk in the patch clearly was confused about 9.0 vs 8.0
* random whitespace added to some lines
* the entire current fixture file is kinda outdated wrt the current data
model and needs much bigger rejiggering...
thanks for the patch!
Stefan