Re: Domain check constraint not honored?
От | Jim Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Domain check constraint not honored? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 56337655.3060500@BlueTreble.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Domain check constraint not honored? (Eric Schwarzenbach <subscriber@blackbrook.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Domain check constraint not honored?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 10/29/15 5:29 PM, Eric Schwarzenbach wrote: > I'm just now converting that path to use a custom domain (along with > custom operators) instead of just being a string. (The custom operators > allow the paths to be sorted properly without each segment needing to be > filled with zeros to a fixed length.) (Also FWIW, the latest version of > this regexp is now '^([0-9]+.)*[0-9]+$') Have you looked at using int[]? It wouldn't be hard to go between that and the string representation using string_to_array() and array_to_string(). There's also a chance that eventually you'd be able to do FKs on it. -- Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: