Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table.
| От | Jim Nasby |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table. |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 5627D86D.6070903@BlueTreble.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table. (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table.
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 10/21/15 8:11 AM, Andres Freund wrote: > Meh. Adding complexity definitely needs to be weighed against the > benefits. As pointed out e.g. by all the multixact issues you mentioned > upthread. In this case your argument for changing the name doesn't seem > to hold much water. ISTM VISIBILITY_MAP_FROZEN_BIT_CAT_VER shold be defined in catversion.h instead of pg_upgrade.h though, to ensure it's correctly updated when this gets committed though. -- Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: