Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table.

Jim Nasby wrote:
> On 10/21/15 8:11 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> >Meh. Adding complexity definitely needs to be weighed against the
> >benefits. As pointed out e.g. by all the multixact issues you mentioned
> >upthread. In this case your argument for changing the name doesn't seem
> >to hold much water.
> 
> ISTM VISIBILITY_MAP_FROZEN_BIT_CAT_VER shold be defined in catversion.h
> instead of pg_upgrade.h though, to ensure it's correctly updated when this
> gets committed though.

That would be untidy and pointless.  pg_upgrade.h contains other
catversions.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services