Re: hot_standby_feedback default and docs

On 9/16/15 5:52 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> IMHO the default is the best one at the current time.
> See recovery_min_apply_delay.

The applications of recovery_min_apply_delay are likely to be varied and
specific, so there might not be a general answer to this, but wouldn't
you want hot_standby_feedback on with it?  Because the longer you wait
on the standby, the more likely it is that the primary will clean stuff
away.