On 09/12/2015 11:35 AM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> On the other hand, a grep indicates that there are two places that
> MemoryContextData.nextchild is set (and we therefore probably need
> to also set the new field), and Jan's proposed patch only changes
> one of them. If we do this, I think we need to change both places
> that are affected, so ResourceOwnerCreate() in resowner.c would
> need a line or two added.
ResourceOwnerCreate() sets ResourceOwnerData.nextchild, not
MemoryContextData.nextchild.
Regards, Jan
--
Jan Wieck
Senior Software Engineer
http://slony.info