-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 07/28/2015 01:56 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> writes:
>> Plug RLS related information leak in pg_stats view.
>
> BTW, a note about this: I see you bumped catversion in both
> branches, which is good, but you bumped it to the same thing, which
> I think is bad. Two branches with different initial catalog
> contents should not have identical catversions; that more or less
> defeats the point of having the version number.
>
> What I've done in such cases is to assign yyyymmdd1 to the back
> branch and yyyymmdd2 to HEAD.
Ok -- good point. I'll bump HEAD
- --
Joe Conway
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)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=4Okg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----