-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 07/28/2015 01:22 PM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>>>> dblink: add polymorphic result functions
>>>
>>> Seems pretty ugly to me to add a dummy argument to functions,
>>> just so that you can specify the result type. The problem it's
>>> trying to solve is real, though. Should we take it as it is, or
>>> wait for some cleaner approach?
>>
>> Put like that, it does sound quite ugly. I take it we have no
>> better alternative proposed?
>
> Joe Conway suggested a more generic approach here:
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/559A9643.9070409@joeconway.com.
> I'm not sure why that was not pursued. It certainly seems better to
> me.
I really think the second approach in that email is the right way to
go. Is there any benefit we get from the dblink specific hack that we
don't get via the cast?
I guess it is just be a matter of someone getting around to making it
happen. I can put it on my list of things to do, but probably will not
get to looking at it for at least a few more weeks.
- --
Joe Conway
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJVt+xpAAoJEDfy90M199hlIM8P/iRq3nZo6Q/u14D9Vqvd8qZ1
cPaBgGoHvCCuM3rS/z0DobBMjKll0oEerjXeuBKTjWBwilPrdHMZahueFZ1896Mh
atcj7kz8O3nBj27sBAHI1tXCTPRkjOIpt6nNu8BEsG8mUmX8wC2odfyGFZIKzw2j
dtLGsczSMwrXnE1yTzgCYWVl0ej8y/CtAmL6uEQOIA5XDHmYe6EqqPd3rcNBNg+I
endHrAXGm/VVsKGUJfisWItVbPJy4VBx1y1iXfApxePceHjW6/U0Ivds5Qu+K3wd
0pwsBmqlHNBGzwril1jBpm9gecIYY6916Hbru7Fafae4bbFHRTDw0ExURybrlhGo
MjOhWmfpsCutGmBktgWxqiOY9UDnG1+aXREKIv7bIavPhBYbBRkvqT7qrAKureex
y2XZz86tMV2bUZxRyp6tFo8aL5hheV7UoaPKGlOxfgUNFv3U2uRUopVPH6uR1Z80
+JQoC2hDadI3wQ6/2egL62pQR3l/Ts8zF0sCFEGAZVrFklEneHsUS7PAbqIfY+TI
Ffc5q8Vm0QplWXr5vvxL1JKepXGgKSidMEnylAwIxKAnPtXyosPe1sZ+ocA+3gbP
Uj/bElWemX8b8YF/F1mecHqoLAvJ+3NKUdwS805VmdCLO1nxictKEOHAJFeQomif
OQquxdkcGtA9dmCt8JJ9
=SaUZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----