Re: Which replication is the best for our case ?
| От | John R Pierce |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Which replication is the best for our case ? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 5592EACA.2090009@hogranch.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Which replication is the best for our case ? ("ben.play" <benjamin.cohen@playrion.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Which replication is the best for our case ?
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
On 6/30/2015 9:57 AM, ben.play wrote: > To be more precise : We have a database with more than 400 Gb and ONE table > with more than 100 Gb of data. This is huge for doctrine. When the cron > runs, it writes a lot on the disks in temporary file (although we have 128 > GB of Ram...). Of course, each table is well indexes... > > That is why I'm thinking about replication : My server A (master) is for my > users... and my server B is a server reserved for calculations (and this > server B which writes on the base) > > This is a image of my dream system : > <http://postgresql.nabble.com/file/n5855916/9e41ce1f-38ea-4fba-a437-a43c598e655c.jpg> > (If you can't see the image : > http://tof.canardpc.com/view/9e41ce1f-38ea-4fba-a437-a43c598e655c.jpg) what happens when master A continues to update/insert into these tables that your cron job is batch updating on the offline copy ? How would you merge those changes in ? -- john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: