Re: BackendPidGetProc doesn't return PGPROC for background worker?
| От | Amit Langote |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: BackendPidGetProc doesn't return PGPROC for background worker? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 55554E64.8060701@lab.ntt.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | BackendPidGetProc doesn't return PGPROC for background worker? (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: BackendPidGetProc doesn't return PGPROC for background
worker?
Re: BackendPidGetProc doesn't return PGPROC for background worker? |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2015-05-15 AM 05:01, Pavel Stehule wrote: > > I am trying to start bgworker from bgworker and create communication > between these process. I have a code based on test_shm_mq. This code fails > because BackendPidGetProc doesn't find related bgworker process, although > the registrant process is living > One reason for this may be that the worker was not started with the flag BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS which is necessary to perform InitProcess() that would initialize a PGPROC entry for it. But if you'd used the same method for initializing workers as test_shm_mq_setup(), then it should have. Thanks, Amit
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: