Re: schema or database
| От | John R Pierce |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: schema or database |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 552B28DE.2050007@hogranch.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: schema or database (Ian Barwick <ian@2ndquadrant.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: schema or database
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
On 4/12/2015 7:20 PM, Ian Barwick wrote: > If as you say access to the database is via a single application database > user, it will probably make more sense to use multiple schemas rather than > multiple databases. Keeping everything in one database will simplify > administration (e.g. making backups - ypu'll just need to dump the one database > rather than looping through a variable number) and will make life easier if you > ever need to do some kind of query involving multiple customers. > There will also be less overhead when adding a new schema vs adding > a new database. and less overhead in connections, as one client connection can serve multiple customers -- john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: