On 1/22/15 2:01 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>
> * I would to simplify a behave of evaluating of message expression - probably I disallow NULL there.
>
>
> Well, the only thing I could see you doing there is throwing a different error if the hint is null. I don't see
thatas an improvement. I'd just leave it as-is.
>
>
> I enabled a NULL - but enforced a WARNING before.
I don't see the separate warning as being helpful. I'd just do something like
+ (err_hint != NULL) ? errhint("%s", err_hint) : errhint("Message attached to failed assertion is
null")));
There should also be a test case for a NULL message.
> * GUC enable_asserts will be supported
>
>
> That would be good. Would that allow for enabling/disabling on a per-function basis too?
>
>
> sure - there is only question if we develop a #option enable|disable_asserts. I have no string idea.
The option would be nice, but I don't think it's strictly necessary. The big thing is being able to control this on a
per-functionbasis (which I think you can do with ALTER FUNCTION SET?)
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com