On 05/01/15 20:44, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Of course, if recovery_min_apply_delay were a proper GUC, we'd just
>> configure it with a minimum value of zero and be done :-(
>
> Amen. We should *really* convert all of the recovery.conf parameters
> to be GUCs.
>
Well, there is an ongoing effort on that and I think the patch is very
close to the state where committer should take a look IMHO, I have only
couple of gripes with it now and one of them needs opinions of others
anyway.
-- Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services