Re: VACUUM unable to accomplish because of a non-existent MultiXactId
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: VACUUM unable to accomplish because of a non-existent MultiXactId |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 5403.1448652828@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: VACUUM unable to accomplish because of a non-existent MultiXactId (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: VACUUM unable to accomplish because of a non-existent
MultiXactId
|
| Список | pgsql-admin |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Kouber Saparev wrote:
>> Recently I spotted an auto vacuum that is constantly being run over a pg_toast table in the database. Interestingly
theunderlying table did not have that amount of writes that would trigger the auto vacuum every minute.
>>
>> When I tried to run the VACUUM manually it died with a non-existent MultiXactId error:
>>
>> db=# vacuum analyze verbose pg_toast.pg_toast_376621;
>> INFO: vacuuming "pg_toast.pg_toast_376621"
>> ERROR: MultiXactId 2915905228 does no longer exist -- apparent wraparound
> Hmm, I don't think there can be multixacts in toast tables at all,
> normally.
Couldn't creation and deletion of a toasted object within the same
transaction do it?
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: