Re: BUG #17148: About --no-strict-names option and --quiet option of pg_amcheck command

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Daniel Gustafsson
Тема Re: BUG #17148: About --no-strict-names option and --quiet option of pg_amcheck command
Дата
Msg-id 53F68B28-4FDB-4AC9-882C-A620D3389EB0@yesql.se
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: BUG #17148: About --no-strict-names option and --quiet option of pg_amcheck command  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>)
Ответы Re: BUG #17148: About --no-strict-names option and --quiet option of pg_amcheck command  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-bugs
> On 18 Aug 2021, at 13:44, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com> wrote:

> I think this both of these things could be deleted and we could get rid of the --quiet option, to simplify all this.

It simplifies the pg_amcheck code a bit, but it at the same time complicates
the tests as they are currently written.  Not sure that we want to change that
much as this point in the 14 cycle?

> Neither of these behaviors is in common with any other PostgreSQL tool.

That I agree with.

--
Daniel Gustafsson        https://vmware.com/




В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Masahiko Sawada
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BUG #17151: A SEGV in optimizer
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BUG #17148: About --no-strict-names option and --quiet option of pg_amcheck command