Re: [JDBC] Setting PG-version without recompiling
| От | Craig Ringer |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [JDBC] Setting PG-version without recompiling |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 53C352BE.6040807@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Setting PG-version without recompiling (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 07/03/2014 10:16 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas@visena.com> writes: >> Hi. Â I'm up for testing 9.4 but my JDBC-driver fails to connect due to PG's >> minor-version string: "4beta1". Is it possible to set this somewhere without >> recompiling PG? > > No, and even if you could, that would be the wrong approach. The right > approach is to fix the JDBC driver to not complain about such version > strings. I'm a bit surprised they haven't done so long since, considering > how long PG beta versions have been tagged like that. For that matter, > they really ought not complain about strings like "9.5devel" or > "9.5alpha2" either. Yeah, that's horrible. We should be using server_version_num . It should be a quick enough fix, I'll take a look. -- Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: