On 05/20/2014 08:48 AM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> I can't find the thread now, but I'm pretty sure that we decided to
> change the name of pg_recvlogical, because its inconsistent with other
> client utils? No?
>
>
This thread, perhaps??
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20130923084634.GA15285@awork2.anarazel.de
Cheers,
Steve